I do have some glee tags that you might be interested in, you can find them here. Though I feel I should point out that it took me perhaps the entirety of season 4 to warm up to the newbies so you’d find posts where I’m going to bat for them while my earlier posts would be a lot of “meh, I’m not interested or convinced”.
Tony Award winning actor and singer Alan Cumming (Cabaret, CBS’s The Good Wife), two-time Golden Globe nominated actress and singer Lea Michele (Scream Queens, Glee, Spring Awakening) and Emmy nominated songwriter, musician and actor Darren Criss (The Assassination of Gianni Versace: American Crime Story, Hedwig and the Angry Inch) to headline the third annual Elsie Fest with special guest performances by platinum selling recording artist Ingrid Michaelson (Natasha, Pierre & The Great Comet of 1812, Alter Egos EP) and Broadway veteran and Tony nominee Norm Lewis (Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street, The Phantom of the Opera, ABC’s hit show Scandal). Z100’s Elvis Duran to host the one-day outdoor music festival celebrating stars and songs from the stage and screen on Sunday, October 8 at Central Park SummerStage in New York City. Additional performers and guests to be announced.
Tickets to Elsie Fest are available via pre-sale code from ElsieFest.com today at 10am EST. General on-sale to the public will be available on Friday, August 4 at 11am EST on TicketFly.com. Doors open at 5pm; performances begin at 6pm. Exclusive meet and greet packages available for concert goers, as well as festival merchandise and singalongs from the famed West Village piano bar Marie’s Crisis.
“Being a ‘musical theater fan’ has never been just about loving musical theater,” says Criss, co-founder of Elsie Fest. “It’s about loving the things in pop culture that inspire it; from the actors, recording artists and personalities, to the songs – which not only include Broadway and Great American songbook classics, but hits from film, TV, radio and the internet. Elsie Fest brings all of that together in one place. It’s a pop culture cabaret.”
Elsie Fest is co-founded and executive produced by Criss, talent managerRicky Rollins, Jordan Roth and Dr. Sidney J. Stern. Elsie Fest is a Bowery Presents production.
A portion of the proceeds will be donated to Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS.
Hold the fuck up. She just opens the door without a care. How the fuck is this woman still queen? That would confirm Stannis accusations, prove that she did usurp the throne, and get her convicted of incest. But the rules have suddenly ceased to apply to Cersei. Who cares about the story making sense?
What does it matter? Cersei has no claim to the throne anyway, she never did. The Lannister men seat her there with swords, not by right of birth. Who’s left to prosecute her? She blew those people up with wildfire. If no one cares about murder by wildfire why would they care about this?
The Targaryens took Westeros by Conquest, so did the Baratheon, and so did the Lannisters.
Dorne and the Reach are gone or her supporters. The Stormlands have no men left. The Vale and North are busy in the North, She’s fighting them anyway. All that’s left to her are her Westerlands and the held-by-force Riverlands. Those she still has cannot betray. Tarly and Euron knew what this was. The Riverlands and Crownlands are camped by Lannister men.
She risks very little because she has very little.
You know, I’m gonna rant about this because the show just keeps piling up complete nonsense on top of compete nonsense, and it’s driving me up the wall. This is not directed at you though; you just opened the floodgates of my frustration. Warning for a long irritated rant under the cut.
Yes, Cersei has no claim to the throne, but the Lannisters did not take the throne by conquest, they took it because D&D decided they would, and despite all the reasons they shouldn’t. The fact that Cersei managed to get within two feet of this throne is the stupidest thing I’ve ever seen on this show, and I’ve seen a lot of stupid things on this show. This isn’t in any way comparable to the Targaryen conquest or the Baratheon acclamation – those made sense, Cersei’s coronation did not.
Let’s take it from the top: Cersei blew up the Sept of Baelor along with the High Sparrow, the Queen, the Hand, a shit ton of nobles including a Lord Paramount and his heir, a number of septons and septas, a good amount of Tyrell and Lannister soldiers (Kevan was in the sept, there were Lannister soldiers there) and however big a number of smallfolk was around. By every measure and every piece of info we’ve ever been told about wildfire, there was no way that it didn’t spread to surrounding buildings because it’s the most volatile substance in Westeros and only gets more volatile with time. Those caches had been sitting there for, what?, over 20 years by the show’s count? The destruction left behind should have been monumental.
What this event should have done is make Cersei public enemy # 1 in Westeros. It’s a complete and utter political suicide that should have gotten her
ostracized
and executedkilled. She demonstrated that she had no qualms about murdering thousands of people, took out the highest religious and political power in the land, killed the leader of a movement much beloved by the smallfolk and a queen also beloved by the population of King’s Landing, became a kinslayer, and showed the nobility that there is literally no crime she’d shy from committing or any person, high ranking or not, she would not obliterate. That’s a long list of politically-damning crimes that logically should have turned everyone against her. She showed that she can not be trusted, that no oath would be kept, that feudal obligations have no importance to her, that the crown has no credibility and the law does not apply to it. So why would anyone accept her as queen? She proved that she was a menace and that she had no respect for, well, anything – not laws, not sacred places, not bonds of kinship, not religious authority, not ancient rights and protections afforded to the nobility. Aerys Targaryen himself did not get away with half what the show had Cersei get away with. She made an enemy of the Faith, the nobility and the smallfolk, or should have if the show had any semblance of consistent storytelling and any respect to its own world.
The idea that anybody would support Cersei after the sept explosion is laughable. The show would have us believe that ~fear~ is why she got away with what she’d done but like, previous monarchs have historically lost their thrones when they angered one of the factions Cersei alienated: the Faith Militants took up arms against Maegor for his polygamous practices and continued fighting even as he obliterated thousands; the nobles rose up against Aerys after the murder of the Starks and their entourage; the smallfolk rioted against Cersei and Joffrey at the beginning of the War of the Five Kings, and before it, they revolted against the Targaryens when they had actual living dragons: they stormed the Dragon pit and died by the hundreds if not thousands because they were fed up with the grief and destruction Rhaenyra and Aegon caused them. But I’m supposed to buy that Cersei gave all three more than sufficient reason to tear her to pieces, and somehow got a crown out of it. As if that’s a logical sequence of events.
Westeros is a feudal society. The crown is quite literally dependent on the nobles to supply funds and food and men, so why would the nobles give Cersei anything when she is killing them for no season? If Cersei can murder a Lord Paramount with no consequences,
what kind of protection could any lesser noble hope for under her
queenship?
The Faith is also an important cornerstone of the legitimacy of the monarchy, but it miraculously ceased to be a factor just because the sept of Baelor exploded, as if that wiped out every single sparrowsepton or was enough to make the Faith a non-influence in Westeros. Trust me, Maegor the Cruel tried, didn’t work out so well for him, and he had Balerion the Black Dread to force his point. And what about the people?
The show’s fluctuation between making the smallfolk a relevant power and making them insignificant (even stupidly and mindlessly aggressive towards Asha, Ellaria and Tyene for reasons only god knows) is tiring. It’s the power of the people that made the sparrows rise to power, the sparrows supported them and lent relief at a time the Lannisters were busy squabbling over the throne. Hell, most of the sparrows are smallfolk and the entire movement emerged out of the devastating war the Lannisters sent the realm into. Cersei’s actions should rightly lead to open riots in the streets, and do not tell me that the people are afraid; she is already killing them so what do they stand to lose anyway? She is bringing another war on their heads after she blew up their chosen representatives and used their homes and shops and very bodies as food to her fire. This is the same population that almost pulled Cersei and Joffrey from their horses and killed them in the streets, but the show’s selective amnesia makes it that the smallfolk have became a mindlessly cheering crowd that is blowing kisses to Euron Greyjoy of all people.
You have no idea how much I wanna throw A Feast For Crows at D&D right now. The writers are just truly making a mockery of the material they are supposedly “adapting”, and have shown fundamental misunderstanding of the very point the books are trying to make.
It only got worse from there. Here’s Cersei’s military situation right after the sept explosion:
1. The city, by all rights, was teeming with Tyrell soldiers. Mace had an army inside the city not too long before, and while they disbanded, it’s unthinkable that he did not keep a large force of them inside the city. Mace Tyrell wasn’t the kind of man to leave his family defenseless in the face of that many sparrows, regardless of how Margaery was trying to work witharound the High Sparrow.
2. The large majority of whatever numbers the Lannisters still had after the casualties of the War of the Five Kings was tied up with Jaime in the Riverlands, forcing Riverrun’s surrender to the Freys.
3. In all the probability, it’s the Tyrells who were keeping the peace inside King’s Landing, both because of the shortage of Lannister soldiers, and because Kevan was working with the Tyrells so Tyrell soldiers and bannermen were surely strewn all over the city and holding main offices.
I’d be pushing my suspension of belief to max if I swallow a scenario where the Tyrell men just fell into disarray after the Tyrell family was taken out, and just peaced out of King’s Landing but I’ll go with it for the sake of argument. At the very least, this should have led to complete and utter chaos in the street. Imagine the situation: the king, his Hand, a couple of small council members (at least), and the queen are dead; there is a section of the city burning and the fire is either spreading or at least threatening to. You have dead bodies everywhere, collapsed buildings and fire hazards and a volatile substance that could have taken the entire fucking city out. The people who were keeping the peace are at best confused and disorganized, and at worst absent and there is no one to help or lend relief efforts or even take charge because there is no substantial man power inside King’s Landing that does not belong to the Tyrells. Jaime should have returned to absolute pandemonium with open riots in the streets and Cersei’s head decorating the wall of the Red Keep, not a coronation where the nobles stood politely ignoring what just happened and the smallfolk just did not care. But what’s a few hundred dead or a devastating hit to their homes and their livelihoods or an impending war brought by a selfish woman chasing her pleasure and power, amiright? Cersei had no allies, no man power to support her coronation, no claim to
the throne, no political power (did they all collectively forget the
Walk of Shame?), and certainly not the love of the people. So how did she become queen again?
The show then doubled down on the implausibility of its narrative this season through a series of illogical triumphs, miraculous competence on the part of the Lannister twins and a sudden cluelessness from Tyrion and Varys. Oh and a side of ignoring its own canon, but what’s a few plot holes between friends?
The Lannister twins are facing odds that should have brought them down, even with Euron’s help. Dorne and the Reach are in open rebellion, the North has seceded with the support of the Vale (I never can understand the Vale’s position in relation to the North now. The Vale lords seem to have acclaimed Jon alongside the Northmen but neither Robert Arryn or Littlefinger as his regent did. So what’s the situation here? Is Jon King in the North and Parts of the Vale? Did Runestone leave the Vale? LOL), Dany is on Dragonstone with dragons, the Riverlands is in chaos, the Stormlands…. I literally have no idea what’s happening with the Stormlands on the show. The writers probably forgot it exists when they killed Stannis off. These aren’t odds that should encourage anyone sane (Euron is not sane so he does not count) to support the Lannisters, especially not with their dark history of turning on their allies. That half-assed conversation with Randyll Tarly offered no compelling reason for him to side with the Lannisters, and the mere idea that the Iron Bank would invest in Cersei because they lost money in the slave trade due to Dany’s action is preposterous. The Iron Bank of Braavos investing in the slave trade? Oh give me a break.
The military triumphs of Euron and Jaime defy logic as well. Euron somehow managed to sneak up on Dany’s fleet…..in open water….. in broad day light. How? Harry Potter’s invisibility cloak? As for Jaime and the HighgardenCasterly Rock situation, did the show forget that the War of the Five Kings happened? The Lannisters do not have the men. They were dependent on the Tyrells because Tywin kept losing men to Robb Stark, the garrison at King’s Landing was decimated when Stannis attacked in the Battle of the Blackwater and soldiers died in the sept explosion.
The Westerlands can not muster 10.000 men on its own after all that. Wasn’t the military shortage the whole point of Jaime and Cersei going to Mace last season to muster men against the High Sparrow anyway? We also can not ignore the fact that they should be spread thin right now: a garrison at King’s Landing, the numbers they left at Casterly Rock, the numbers they must have in the Stormlands to prop whichever clown they put in charge (did we ever get told which clown is currently in charge?) and the numbers they have to have in the Riverlands to prevent the Riverlords from revolting (though honestly, the lack of address of that is crazy. By all rights, the Riverlands should be in open revolt right now as whatever remaining Freys descend into fighting each other over the lordship, and the prisoners they took at the Red Wedding supposedly get freed. Or did Arya kill 95% of the male Freys and peace out afterwards without freeing them because fuck these people, she was only there to kill? Honestly, why are the Riverlanders not pouncing on the remaining Freys and Lannisters?)
But even if the Lannisters do have the men, didn’t we establish that losing one’s castle is a devastating hit to one’s authority and crown? Ghost Robb must be smouldering in the afterlife at Jaime’s careless “oh Casterly Rock is worth nothing. We took all funds from it”. IT’S NOT ABOUT THE MONEY JAIME LANNISTER. If Jaime and Cersei left the Westerlands to Dany’s people and deemed its protection unimportant, why are the Lannister soldier still fighting for them when they deliberately left said soldiers’ families without protection? On another note, how did Jaime get that army out of the Westerlands and into the Reach without anyone noticing the thousands of soldiers marching through? Not Olenna, not Varys, not any Tyrell loyalist. On a third note, where are the armies of the Reach? Randyll Tarly is not the be all, end all of Reacher military leadership, neither does he even have the largest army of the Reacher houses. I suppose the implication is that other houses joined him but again I ask, why? Because that speech Cersei gave about foreign invaders and the Mad King’s daughter is cool, but Dany isn’t the one who blew the sept and presumably killed nobles from the same families that are implied to support her now. I don’t even buy Randyll’s own defection and he had the added incentive of the Paramountcy of the Reach.
Olenna is also a Redwyne by birth so that’s an army that she definitely
had, she also definitely has the Hightowers who just happen to be
Margaery and Loras’ maternal family. The Reach boasts the largest army in the realm ffs, where did they all go? The Tyrell army should have been ready for war, since Olenna was already mobilizing the Reacher forces in accordance with her plans with Dany. Where were they? Where was the largest army in Westeros, the one that was virtually untouched in the show’s canon? How did Highgarden fall?
But the show explained all these plot holes by “they are roses”. All is well.
The worst thing is that they keep piling things up and deliberately making the story harder to accept. It wasn’t enough to gloss over the sept explosion, no let’s make Cersei parade her incest as if it’s the most natural thing in the world and prove to everyone that she was the instigator of all the war and destruction that befell the realm since Robert’s death. Never mind that incest is reviled by every major religion in Westeros, so was kinslaying but apparently nobody cares. The show is even driving the parallel to Aerys hard from the wildfire to the murdered Lord Paramountheir to arousal-by-torture to “I’ll do as I please” but it refuses to give us any sensible pay-off to it, just like it did with Ramsay last season (and no, having them eventually killed in not a proper pay-off).
The problem with these stories is not that there is no one left to stop the antagonists or to hold them accountable, it’s that the show decided that all the people who should be doing their damn best to bring them down aren’t doing it simply because the writers said so. The plot isn’t driven by character motivation or natural story development, it’s driven by the the writers’ desire to up the stakes for our heroes so their triumph can be a spectacle worthy of an Emmy. The irony is that they even fail to make that triumph have any meaning grounded in the moment and the wider story themes. Last season’s Battle of the Bastards was visually beautiful but it was also a logistical mess that defied laws of physics, basic human logic, politics 101, previous worldbuilding and story setup. The writers stripped it from much of its meaning and impact by focusing on gimmicks, and brushing off the beating heart of the Northern storyline: Ned Stark’s legacy. Ramsay’s defeat at the end felt hollow because it did not erase the sting of the Northern houses abandoning the Starks to their fate, which took away from any feelings of triumph that the Starks won their home back and had justice for Robb, Catelyn, Rickon and even Theon. Likewise, the story with Cersei is definitely leading to her downfall eventually, but it’s gonna be meaningless. They contradicted their own canon and threw their worldbuilding out of the window to the point where this ceased to be a coherent story and only became a group of actors emoting at each other and spouting some witty dialogue.
“I was with her when she died,” Ned reminded the king. “She wanted to come home, to rest beside Brandon and Father.” He could hear her still at times. Promise me, she had cried, in a room that smelled of blood and roses. Promise me, Ned. The fever had taken her strength and her voice had been faint as a whisper, but when he gave her his word, the fear had gone out of his sister’s eyes. Ned remembered the way she had smiled then, how tightly her fingers had clutched his as she gave up her hold on life, the rose petals spilling from her palm, dead and black. After that he remembered nothing. They had found him still holding her body, silent with grief. The little crannogman, Howland Reed, had taken her hand from his. Ned could recall none of it. “I bring her flowers when I can,” he said. “Lyanna was … fond of flowers.”
That depends on how willing Aerys is to gamble with the entire future of his dynasty: marrying his daughter off once she flowers at the age of 12 or 13 comes with substantial health risks to her and any child she bears, risks that range from miscarrying, to making it difficult for her to conceive again, to potentially rendering her sterile, to even killing her andor her babe at birth. With Rhaella’s own childbearing troubles being a vivid reminder of what marriage at a young age could cause to a woman’s ability to carry a living healthy child to term, it would be too big of a risk to repeat the same tragedy with her daughter.
The princess is simply too politically precious for them to endanger her life or her childbearing ability in the hope that she might provide a son quickly. I mean, what happens if pregnancy at such a young age ends up killing her or, at the very least, renders her barren or makes it difficult for her to conceive again? What happens if her child does not survive, or turns out to be a girl? The main Targaryen line would be really and truly screwed.
It’d be more sensible to wait till she is 15 or 16 to marry her off and get her with child to increase the chances of her bearing a healthy child without developing any complications that could prevent her from having more – so any child she has would be, at most, only one year older than Viserys, if she conceives immediately, that is. Which would not impact things more than Vierys’ own birth, and that is if we presume her first child is even a son.
About Woman! Rhaegar, do you think that upon learning of the prophecy,
perhaps she would have thought she had to be the prince’s mother? Since
it would take Rhaella to give birth to her brother, then would the
princess think the lineage would be her?
Upon learning of the prophecy? No. There is no reason for her to immediately think that her destiny is to be the Prince’s mother, no more than there was for Rhaegar to think his was to be the Prince’s father in OTL. She is not more prone of think of herself as the vessel for the savior of mankind just because she is a woman; I’d actually argue that she is less likely to consider that possibility based on how Rhaella, who was treated as an incubator for a more important offspring regardless of her own wishes or desires, was treated and how the princess would not be keen at all on receiving the same treatment. And like I said, I believe she might cling to the idea of this prophetic destiny as a way to work through her prophecy-mandated birth, all the death that accompanied it at Summerhall, and perhaps even Rhaella’s disastrous and abusive marriage that happened ~for the greater good~.
But whether she’d change her view of her own contribution to the prophecy, or rather when she’d change it, is unknown. We do not know when exactly Rhaegar stopped believing that he was the Prince that Was Promised in OTL; we know that he thought that Aegon was the savior from the point of his conception but did Rhaegar lose his belief in his own prophetic destiny before that, or was the red comet at Aegon’s conception the deciding factor for him? Did he come to view the fact that he had no siblings as a sign that perhaps he was not the Prince, or did he have faith that Rhaella would have other children sooner or later? We simply do not know.
Daenerys: The last King in the North was-
Ghost Robb, skateboarding into the room, wearing sunglasses and Uggs, drinking Starbucks and tossing confetti in the air while ‘Never Gonna Give You Up’ plays in the background: me, bitch